Compare the providers below by buyer fit and documented terms. Use the quick picks to form a shortlist, then review the linked evidence and confirm current terms with each provider.
Also useful: get the RCM Vendor Evaluation Scorecard as a free PDF
A related resource for practices going through this decision. Enter your email and we'll send it straight to your inbox.
Check your inbox -- your PDF is on its way.
Quick picks
Best for
Vendor
Starting price
Provider link
Best for independent specialty practices in the 1-50 provider range.
Placement on this page cannot be bought. See our methodology.
Prices and vendor descriptions with a source link come from the held vendor records, read on the date shown. A dash (—) means the unsupported field was removed; it is not a price or a statement about what the vendor offers. Best-for picks are editorial fit guidance. Request current written terms before purchase.
AdvancedMD RCM
For independent specialty practices in the 1-50 provider range.
Use the linked vendor records to check documented terms. Ask providers to demonstrate your required workflows and confirm current commercial terms in writing.
How to choose RCM services for your specialty practice
Specialty workflow depth — Confirm the vendor has billers trained on your specific procedure-code mix. A generalist billing team will leave money on the table in cardiology cath lab work, orthopedic surgical bundles, dermatology Mohs sequencing, urology surgical add-ons, GI endoscopy modifiers, and ENT in-office procedure billing.
Pricing structure alignment — Percentage-of-collections aligns vendor incentive with your revenue. Per-provider subscription is more predictable but does not adjust when payer mix shifts. Pick the structure that matches your revenue volatility, and avoid hybrid models that effectively double-charge during transition periods.
Days-in-AR and denial-rate reporting cadence — Insist on weekly or bi-weekly reporting on aged AR by bucket, denial reason codes, and net collection rate. If the vendor only ships monthly snapshots, you will catch problems 30 days too late to course-correct.
Implementation timeline with named owners — Plan on 60-120 days from contract to first clean claim. Get the implementation Gantt chart with named accountable owners on both sides before signing. Specialty practices with custom fee schedules and surgical add-on coding land at the longer end.
Two of the criteria above have federal text underneath them. On pricing structure: OIG's Compliance Program Guidance for Third-Party Medical Billing Companies (63 FR 70138, December 18, 1998) records a "longstanding concern that percentage billing arrangements may increase the risk of upcoding," and 42 CFR 424.80(b)(5) bars Medicare from paying a billing agent whose compensation is tied to the amounts billed or collected -- so under every percentage-of-collections contract in this guide, Medicare payment lands in the practice's own account, and the vendor's coding-audit process is the control that offsets the incentive. On the prior authorization workload that drives specialty denials: CMS-0057-F (89 FR 8758, effective April 8, 2024) requires Medicare Advantage organizations and Medicaid and CHIP programs, beginning with 2026, to decide standard prior authorization requests within 7 calendar days and expedited requests within 72 hours, and requires every impacted payer to state a specific reason for each denial. A vendor's denial-reason reporting should be reading those reasons back to you by code. The 2024 CAQH Index (Key Takeaways, 2024) puts the staff time saved by the electronic prior authorization standard at 14 minutes per authorization, which for a cardiology or orthopedic group is a measurable share of the work being outsourced.
How long does RCM implementation take for a specialty practice?
Plan on 60 to 120 days from contract signing to first clean claim submitted by the new vendor. Specialty practices with custom fee schedules, multiple payer contracts, or surgical add-on coding tend to land at the longer end. Ask any vendor to walk you through their implementation Gantt chart with named accountable owners on both sides before you sign.
Are there money-back guarantees for RCM services?
Define performance measures and remedies in the proposed agreement. Use clean-claim rate, days in AR and net collection rate to frame the questions you ask.
How do vendors get included?
Placement on this page cannot be bought. Vendors are included using our published methodology and the information and evidence available for each vendor. You can submit corrections or supporting evidence for review. Providers are listed alphabetically. Paid placement is labeled separately.
Bottom line
For most specialty practices, CureMD is a fit because the 32+ specialty templates land closer to the procedure-code reality your billing team actually faces. Independent specialty groups in the 1-50 provider range should look hard at AdvancedMD as an option — the bundled EHR/PM saves a separate software contract. Solo specialists and very small groups (1-3 providers) get the cleanest economics from Tebra's partner-matched managed billing once they price out the per-transaction structure against their monthly claim volume.
RCM is an operator-side concern that compounds across the broader practice operations portfolio. Operators running multi-site specialty groups will want to read the GetTreatmentHelp operator briefing on revenue cycle benchmarks, which covers payer-mix optimization and denial-rate analysis from a multi-site perspective.
Join Practice Insider — Weekly tips on billing, compliance & vendor selection for practice teams
You’re subscribed! Check your inbox.
EHR fact freshness and sources
Dates below apply to the named canonical facts, not to every claim on this page. Unknown means the canonical record has no value; not published means the vendor does not publish it.
AdvancedMD: list price (model: per-encounter-pm-plus-ehr): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (model: per-encounter-practice-management): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (plan: billing-service-companies): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (service: rcm): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (specialty: addiction-medicine): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (specialty: medical): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (specialty: medspa): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (specialty: mental-health): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
AdvancedMD: list price (specialty: physical-medicine): Published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
Tebra: list price (plan: all-in-one): Not published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
Tebra: list price (plan: billing-starter): Not published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
Tebra: list price (plan: ehr-plus): Not published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
Tebra: list price (plan: ehr-starter): Not published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source
Tebra: list price (plan: patient-experience-marketing): Not published; Last reviewed 2026-10-05; GPH-researched; Vendor source