Browse by topic

Each topic is a buyer's home: guides, tools, and a few directory listings.

Independent guidance on the services practices actually buy. The full provider directory sits behind every topic.

Topics
Credentialing & Enrollment Medical Billing & RCM EHR & Practice Software Practice Startup & Consulting HIPAA Compliance, Risk & Legal
Browse
Buyer guides Decision Tools How We Evaluate Research Directory Partners
Get MatchedList Your Firm
EHR & Practice Software

Choose an EHR your practice won't regret in 18 months.

Placement on this page cannot be bought. See our methodology.

How vendors are included and scored: the evidence-packet policy and the status of existing guide orders.

Most EHR software is built for health systems, not the 1-10 provider independent practice: ONC's June 2026 data brief finds 32% of solo physicians on one of the five market-leading developers, against 90% of physicians in practices of more than 50 (ONC, Office-based Physician EHR Adoption, 2008-2024). And the cost of choosing wrong is a migration project. This hub helps you decide what to buy and how to evaluate it: the best EHR systems by specialty and by practice size, what they cost, the demo questions that expose weak fits, and how to switch without losing revenue.

✓ Verdicts assessed on published criteria -- never sold. How we evaluate EHRs →
The comparison

The best EHR systems for small practices, side by side.

The same published criteria, applied the same way to every EHR we evaluate. Built to be cited and embedded.

How to read this table. Vendors and "best for" assessments come from our published evaluation: criteria-based editorial judgments against the published criteria. The stated-figure columns carry the vendor's own published numbers -- vendor-stated, not GPH-measured; each filled cell's source and verification date are recorded in the page source (how these fill). Cells still marked "not yet scored" mean the vendor publishes no verifiable figure. Verify pricing and stated figures with current vendor quotes.
GPH

Best EHR Systems for Small Practices (2026)

6 of 12 evaluated vendors shown · Last updated Jun 2026 · GPH Editorial
Email a colleague
EHR software and systems compared for small and independent practices -- by what each is best for and how it prices.
Vendor Best for Stated implementation Stated specialty coverage Pricing model Provider link
SimplePracticeBehavioral health platform
Mental & behavioral health Switching Team imports data from another system not yet scored $49 / $79 / $99 per provider per month Full evaluation →
athenahealthNetworked platform
Billing-focused practices not yet scored not yet scored Percentage of collections (rate not published) Full evaluation →
Tebra (Kareo)All-in-one platform
All-in-one for independent practices Dedicated onboarding manager with training and enrollment support; no stated timeline Primary care and specialty practices incl. behavioral health, psychiatry, therapy, pediatrics, NP-led clinics Not published: quote-only Full evaluation →
Elation HealthPrimary care EHR
Independent primary care Onboarding with implementation specialists who work with the practice's workflows, free standard data migration and personalized training, then ongoing support; no timeline published not yet scored Not published: quote-only Full evaluation →
Practice FusionWeb-based EHR
Cash-constrained startups not yet scored Not stated in verified vendor sources From $199 per provider per month, annual commitment Full evaluation →
CureMDGroup platform
Multi-location independent groups not yet scored 30+ specialties Subscription Full evaluation →
Cite this comparison
GetPracticeHelp Editorial. (2026). Best EHR Systems for Small Practices. GetPracticeHelp. https://www.getpracticehelp.com/ehr/#compare
Embed this comparison
Includes a backlink + "Source: GetPracticeHelp".
Buyer guides

How to choose an EHR, what's best, what it costs.

Flagship comparison · 2026

Best EHR for Small Practices (2026): 12 Reviewed by Specialty & Size

Our flagship EHR comparison: twelve systems reviewed for the 1-10 provider independent practice, with best-for verdicts by specialty, billing model, and budget.

Updated 2026·Read the guide →
comparison guide
The differentiator

How we evaluate EHR and practice software.

Every EHR we cover is assessed against the same five published criteria by the GPH editorial team -- before any commercial conversation. Vendors can't buy a verdict, change a weighting, or remove a finding. Verdicts today are criteria-based editorial judgments; numeric scoring will be published as our evaluation program matures.

  • ✓ Criteria and weights are published, not implied.
  • ✓ Sponsored placements are labeled and kept out of verdicts.
  • ✓ Every comparison is dated and re-reviewed on a schedule.
Read the full methodology
GPHCriteria

EHR evaluation framework

v1.0 · weights total 100%

Workflow & specialty fitcharting, templates, specialty depth30%
Billing integrationclaims, eligibility, RCM options25%
Implementation & migrationonboarding risk, data import20%
Price & valuetotal cost of ownership, no lock-in15%
Support & data controlresponsiveness, export rights10%
Last updated Jun 2026Methodology →
Decide for yourself

EHR decision tools.

Free, neutral, no email required. They point to a route, not a vendor that paid us.

Free
Find your fit

EHR Fit Quiz

A few questions about your specialty, size, and billing model -- get the EHR profile that fits your practice.

Take the quiz
Free
Cost calculator

EHR Cost & Switching Calculator

Compare subscription and switching costs from sourced EHR facts. Unknown amounts stay visible; add your own quotes.

Compare EHR costs →
Templates & downloads

Take the workflow with you.

EHR Selection Toolkit

Requirements worksheet, scoring matrix, and demo checklist.

Download (PDF)

EHR Specialty Fit Checklist

The specialty-by-specialty feature checklist for demos.

Download (PDF)
Providers listed in HC IT & EHR

A few providers listed in this category.

Verified healthcare IT and EHR providers from the GPH directory. The full list lives in the directory.

Verified provider shortlist

Directory-verified · not a comparisons

Selection basis: directory verification status and published directory score. Verification reflects a claimed-and-reviewed listing -- it is not an editorial verdict, and it is not for sale in editorial surfaces. Order is alphabetical.

•

AAIT Services

Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · Anchorage, AK · Directory score 85/100.

View in directory →
•

CureIS Healthcare

Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · Tucson, AZ · Directory score 85/100.

View in directory →
•

EngageMED, Inc.

Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · North Little Rock, AR · Directory score 85/100.

View in directory →
•

GetixHealth, LLC

Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · Glendale, AZ · Directory score 85/100.

View in directory →
Editorial shortlist above · sponsored placements, when present, appear below

Sponsored placements

No sponsored placements are currently running in this category. Sponsored placements always appear in this separate, labeled block -- never in the editorial shortlist.

Are you a healthcare IT or EHR provider? Sponsored placements are available →

Sponsored placements are paid Featured listings. They appear in a separate, labeled block and have no influence on the editorial shortlist, the comparison, or any verdict on this page.

Looking for more? Browse every healthcare IT and EHR provider -- filter by state and specialty.

Open the directoryGet matched -- free
Questions

EHR selection, answered.

Most small-practice EHRs price as a per-provider subscription, but the subscription is rarely the whole cost: implementation, data migration, interfaces, and add-ons are where budgets slip. Model total cost of ownership before comparing monthly rates. Only 10 of the 18 vendors we checked publish a usable price at all -- our EHR pricing transparency finding shows which do. EHR pricing guide →
Evaluate four things in order: workflow fit for your specialty, billing fit for how you get paid, implementation risk, and data control. Demo polish is not on the list. The selection framework →
The EHR is the clinical record; practice management software runs scheduling, billing, and the front office. Most small-practice platforms bundle both -- the question is which side does your bottleneck live on. Full explainer →
Behavioral health has its own requirements -- structured notes, treatment plans, telehealth, and superbills -- that general-purpose platforms handle poorly. The mental-health EHR comparison →
Yes, if the migration is run as a revenue project, not an IT project: parallel billing periods, data validation before cutover, and a payer-facing checklist. The migration guide →
Through clearly-labeled Featured/Sponsored placements, the Get Matched service, and directory listings -- all kept separate from editorial verdicts. Our evaluation criteria are published, and sponsorship can't change a verdict or a finding. See our editorial standards.
Buyer guides

State & national vendor comparisons.

Independent, never-paid comparisons of directory vendors, generated from the GetPracticeHelp directory. Ordering basis is stated on each page.

Browse all vendor comparisons →
Keep going

Sibling topics for independent practices.

EHR fact freshness and sources

Dates below apply to the named canonical facts, not to every claim on this page. Unknown means the canonical record has no value; not published means the vendor does not publish it.